Mark, do you have any thoughts on this one? A
On Mon 03 Aug 2015 06:29, Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > >> To follow up, it does look like it might be broken, but you can ignore >> my suggested fix. > > I'm not that familiar with srfi-64, but it looks like the problem (if > it's not expected) is that test-group doesn't handle the case where it's > creating the first group, i.e. no prior test-begin. > > In that situation it appears that test-runner-current returns #f, > causing test-result-alist! to fail. > > Hope this helps
