Hello Andy, Ludovic, Mark, > >> So I guess we should revert 83d4c4d622b406ec0bc9d8139ec8182fa72b5720 and > >> release 2.2.4 afterwards. Does that make sense, Andy?
I hope (one of) you will find some time to look at
bug#29669: repl-print - requet for improvement
bug#29684: exception printers - request for improvement
so a solution could be part of 2.2.4
Thanls,
David
pgpI7mw0Bb1Xy.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
