Cyril Roelandt <[email protected]> skribis: > On 04/06/2013 04:09 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> We also have bdb, so we can use it if that’s what is expected. > > Well, I managed to do this with the compatibility mode of gdbm.
Looks good (apparently Debian builds it against bdb, but using gdbm sounds good: <http://packages.debian.org/sid/python2.7>.) > Maybe this patch should be merged with the previous one. I think I'll submit > it > to Python. Yes, even better. > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/python-fix-dbm.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > +--- setup.py 2013-04-06 00:53:37.000000000 +0200 > ++++ setup.py.new 2013-04-06 19:55:05.000000000 +0200 > +@@ -1158,10 +1158,14 @@ > + for cand in dbm_order: Can you add a comment at the beginning of the patch stating what it does, and what its status is wrt. upstream? Thanks! Ludo’.
