Nikita Karetnikov <[email protected]> skribis: >>> I guess that "wrong number of arguments" can be handled by >>> (lambda args ...). Still, the above feels much safer. > >> Not sure what you mean, but the above snippet is OK. > > I thought that it's possible to remove 'match' and get the "wrong number > of arguments" from (strerror ...). But now I'm not sure. "wrong number > of arguments" should be handled by 'wrong-number-of-args', not > 'system-error'. So I'll use the proposed version.
Exactly. ‘strerror’ is equivalent to the same-named C function–that is, it returns the error string corresponding to the given errno value. Ludo’.
