Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > Am Dienstag, 7. Mai 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >> I believe this is fixed by 6d267f0. There was a circular dependency >> between the ghostscript and xorg modules, introduced in commit e0eb886, >> and leading to this admittedly obscure backtrace. > > Excellent, thanks for your help! One suggestion: Could maybe ghostscript- > with-x be moved to ghostscript.scm?
No, because the idea of moving it to a separate file was precisely to get rid of the X/Ghostscript circular dependency. > $ guix package -A ghostscript > ghostscript 9.06.0 out gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm:121:2 > ghostscript-with-x 9.06.0 out gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm:121:2 > > This is probably due to its inheritance from ghostscript in the given file. Yes, exactly. This can be fixed by explicitly passing a different ‘location’ field. Ludo’.
