Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and >> development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re >> encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development >> version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an >> up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest >> release. > > Or alternatively, release more often :-)
I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound like a good idea. > I wonder whether we should not make a point release after each security > update instead of encouraging people to use "guix pull" (but we would > quickly arrive at 0.9.9 now, after which only 1.0.0 would be a reasonable > option to keep numerical and lexicographical ordering consistent). > Or a point-point release as 0.9.0.1 and so on. I would like that. We could make patch releases for each time we merge core-updates / security-fixes into master. ~~ Ricardo
