> This collision is expected. The 'ld' within ld-wrapper, generated from > the template in gnu/packages/ld-wrapper.in, automatically adds -rpath > arguments to the linker for each shared library, so that the runtime > linker will be able to find them in their non-standard locations.
If one of those 'ld' files is the real ld, and the other is supposed to be a wrapper around the real one that adds functionality, then how is it that things will always work out OK if only one of them is installed? I'm not sure how the "arbitrary" selection works, but doesn't the choice matter?
