Taylan UlrichBayırlı/Kammer <taylanbayi...@gmail.com> writes: > It would be better to be consistent with the home page and make clear > that GuixSD is a GNU distribution, with Linux-libre being the default > kernel for the foreseeable future. > > Background: Wikipedia has a policy to call GNU/Linux distributions > "Linux distribution" because that wrong term is more commonly used by > the public. To define GuixSD as a "GNU/Linux distribution" gives them > in turn justification to define it as a "Linux distribution" instead.
FWIW, I like to call the system just “GNU” and GuixSD a “variant of the GNU system”. To me “Linux” is a technical detail that doesn’t need to be mentioned explicitly each time when speaking to a general audience. (This can be extended to “variant of the GNU system with Linux” when needed, or just “GNU with Linux”, which is really close to “GNU+Linux” or the more ambiguous “GNU/Linux”.) The name affirms the vision towards which we’re working, and it acknowledges the concerted effort in getting us so far. The name is not about acknowledging *software* as such. I feel that convincing the current set of Wikipedia editors is a lost cause. It looks even worse in the German Wikipedia, where the “article” on the GNU/Linux naming controversy insinuates that this is primarily about stroking the egos of rms and the small group of GNU developers. (I just spent some time submitting some changes to that page.) I’d be okay with another way to describe what GuixSD is (especially once we offer an additional image using the Hurd), but I’m also fine with leaving it as it is. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC http://elephly.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
