On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:59:14PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:40:20PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > > > They recommend we apply for a vendor zone instead [2]. We would not have > > > to run our own NTP servers. > > > > > > Does anyone know if GNU or the FSF have a vendor zone we could use? > > > Otherwise, we should apply for one and adjust our ntp-service. > > > > Apparently 1.gnu.pool.ntp.org does not exist, so I suppose we can apply > > for one. > > > > I’ll email the GNU maintainer list to let them know and double-check. > > Based on that discussion, I've applied for guix.pool.ntp.org.
The DNS for {0,1,2,3}.guix.pool.ntp.org is live, and the attached patch
is working for me.
I think we should document that I am the administrative contact for the
"zone". Any suggestions for where to document that?
From e8fd9d703dba134dab7f008951e68d11d3d2ca21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 20:43:40 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] services: ntp: Use the NTP pool via the 'guix' zone.
* gnu/services/networking.scm (%ntp-servers): Use *.guix.pool.ntp.org.
---
gnu/services/networking.scm | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/services/networking.scm b/gnu/services/networking.scm
index c38158189..b52af69b4 100644
--- a/gnu/services/networking.scm
+++ b/gnu/services/networking.scm
@@ -335,9 +335,10 @@ Protocol (DHCP) client, on all the non-loopback network
interfaces."
(define %ntp-servers
;; Default set of NTP servers.
- '("0.pool.ntp.org"
- "1.pool.ntp.org"
- "2.pool.ntp.org"))
+ '("0.guix.pool.ntp.org"
+ "1.guix.pool.ntp.org"
+ "2.guix.pool.ntp.org"
+ "3.guix.pool.ntp.org"))
;;;
--
2.13.3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
