Theodoros Foradis <theodo...@foradis.org> writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Theodoros Foradis <theodo...@foradis.org> writes: >> >>> My guess (not being familiar with qt), is that somehow, having the two >>> inputs in different prefixes, causes the problem with the package's >>> build system. I gave a look at the cmake files, but couldn't locate the >>> issue/fix. >> >> You could try to validate your hypothesis by using a union package such >> as it was done for python-pyqt+qscintilla. That package would have only >> one prefix. If that really does make a difference we might be able to >> investigate the issue further. > > Thanks for the union package recommendation. I tried that, but > unfortunately it does not fix the icon issue. > > I see that there is a wip-qt-paths branch in our git repo. I don't > really know its purpose, maybe it's worth to try rebasing it on > master and build pulseview with that?
Hello, and sorry for breaking this package! I don't know what the wip-qt-paths branch is for, but it looks like a good place to fix the problem, and I'm sure Hartmut and 宋文武 would appreciate more testers. Can you try rebasing it and see if it makes a difference? I will try to investigate more towards the weekend as I really want to get rid of the monolithic Qt :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
