2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com>: > Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> writes: > > > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> > > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs > > > > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and > > python2-pynacl. > > --- > > gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ > > #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config) > > #:use-module (gnu packages popt) > > #:use-module (gnu packages python) > > + #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils) > > #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto) > > #:use-module (gnu packages python-web) > > #:use-module (gnu packages terminals) > > This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and > (gnu packages password-utils). Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to > python-crypto.scm. Thoughts? >
Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place.
