Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Christopher Lemmer Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> skribis: > >> It seems to me that StumpWM broke somehow, for some reason. I can >> confirm there was a version change: >> >> -sbcl-stumpwm@18.05:out >> /gnu/store/i0picr2xr2aq2a52nsaw67nvar1r3khw-sbcl-stumpwm-18.05 >> +sbcl-stumpwm@18.11:out >> /gnu/store/6h2iln76dx8pxdp1hsaqb1yncm8viczj-sbcl-stumpwm-18.11 >> >> I am not sure if this is the cause or something else. At any rate, when >> I try to run commands such as "gnew" (the command to make a new >> group/workstation) I get back: >> >> Error In Command 'gnew': invalid number of arguments: 2 >> >> I though I'd try running the command manually and check the error, but >> this also happens with eval! Some other commands are not affected. >> >> (I can try re-enabling the live REPL in StumpWM to play around with it, >> but I currently have it off because they have the same live hacking >> vulnerability in SBCL/SLIME that we had in Guile/Geiser some time ago.) > > Pierre, does that ring a bell? > > Others on the mailing list reported being happy with the upgrade, but > maybe they use different bits of StumpWM. > > Thanks, > Ludo’.
I did a quick patch to see if downgrading would fix the problems I was having: #+BEGIN_SRC diff diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm index d8da2951d..18b68cb07 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm @@ -1020,6 +1020,19 @@ productive, customizable lisp based systems.") (license license:gpl2+) (properties `((cl-source-variant . ,(delay cl-stumpwm)))))) +(define-public stumpwm-18.05 + (package + (inherit stumpwm) + (version "18.05") + (source (origin + (method url-fetch) + (uri (string-append + "https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/archive/" + version ".tar.gz")) + (sha256 + (base32 "1n2gaab3lwgf5r1hmwdcw13dkv9xdd7drn2shx28kfxvhdc9kbb9")) + (file-name (string-append "stumpwm-" version ".tar.gz")))))) + (define-public sbcl-stumpwm (deprecated-package "sbcl-stumpwm" stumpwm)) #+END_SRC The problems went away. I'd be curious to hear indeed if anyone else is having trouble making groups... if I'm the only one, I wonder what it could be about my configuration that is causing this.