Hi, Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
>> It would have the same effect as Marius’ commit >> 296551a2e9310d4a030ee49530e9367e73aaeecf, wouldn’t it? > > I tested and it works! :) > >> My understanding, at this point, is that we need to find out why >> ‘preconv’ segfaults, no? > > I'm not completely sure but it seems that libpipeline breaks preconv for one > of > those two reasons: Did you get a backtrace of ‘preconv’ showing that the segfault is in libpipeline? Thanks, Ludo’.
