> On 27. Jun 2019, at 21:03, Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> wrote:

> Perhaps, but if the reason for the slowness on their first boot was a
> suboptimal /dev/hwrng source, I would expect it to be equally slow for
> each boot, since we unconditionally read 64 bytes each time.

It’s 512 bytes, not that that should fundamentally change anything.




Reply via email to