Pierre, Ivan, Pierre Langlois wrote:
From https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz... downloading from https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz... rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz 147.5MiB 1.6MiB/s 01:35 [##################] 100.0% sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/jm9xvf6qy4zxkb7rkmpz8ygf55l8v8v5-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz: expected hash: 18r688ih4xi9m8gv55g1amb8inrwkdxp5fbcqb6i4gqxi90l3i0m actual hash: 06xv2p6zq03lidr0yaf029ii8wnjjqa894nkmrm6s0rx47by9i04
I get that too.
Hopefully it's not unstable :-/.
Since release archives are signed that would imply some horrible things about their key management, so I doubt it very much. I guess we'll find out.
I've gone ahead and pushed a fix since the signature checked out. I'm closing this bug for now...
However, I'd be interested to know what the previous hash described. Do you still have that file around, Ivan?
Thanks, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
