Raghav Gururajan <raghavgurura...@disroot.org> writes:
>> Is there a good >> reason not to include pinentry-tty or somemthing similarly small? > > It appears pinentry-tty is only console-based. If graphical > applications like MUA, Key Managers etc require pinentry-program, it > usually uses pop-up (gui) for passphrase input. Since pinentry provides > both console and gui, I suggested it as it will be well-rounded > solution. :) I guess the reason for not adding a graphical pinentry is that this would increase the package closure of the gnupg package. Perhaps we should add gnupg-minimal for use in other package definitions. -- Ricardo
