Vincente, Brett, Brett Gilio 写道：
Vicente Eduardo <vic...@gmail.com> writes:I would like to have two versions, or at least the dynamic one, that's the common wayRuby should be built, and also the Guixy style.
Important: static linking isn't the Guixy style at all!Statically linking different packages ‘subverts’ Guix, can subvert grafting and lead to undetected security holes.
Generally, I think we dynamically link most objects.
Correct.
_BUT_, I could bemissing part of the story here. So I am going to wait for the higherpowers that be to respond.
You could ask Pjotr Prins and David Thompson but I suspect that it was simply an oversight: most packages link dynamically by default because it's the sane thing to do, and it would have been reasonable to assume Ruby did too.
If there is a good reason to link statically, it should be added in a comment.
Kind regards, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
