Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jan. 22., Sze, 20:58): > > Gábor, > > Gábor Boskovits 写道: > > Oops, I missed that. > > I'm suprised I haven't confused add* & *add once so far in this > thread :-)
Yes, I am also a bit confused. > > > There was some upstream discussion to get useradd and groupadd > > to > > busybox upstream, > > as this seems to be causing problems everywhere. They told that > > they > > are unwilling to include them as is, > > but would accept a wrapper thar forward to their > > adduser/addgroup > > implementation. > > I don't know which discussion you're referring to, and much might > have changed since 2016, but I read this[0] to mean the opposite: > Busybox should provide the shadow-compatible *add variants, and > reimplement their old add* as simple wrappers around that. That's > from an upstream(ish) person. > > “adduser/addgroup tend to be symlinks or wrappers, if they exist > at > all, but by and large are deprecated. busybox should implement > applets that mimic shadow here and deprecate the old ones, if > not > throw them out. although we can probably rename & massage the > sources in these cases” > > Still, Busybox *add patches welcome, it would seem. We'll still > have to deal with this for the lifetime of the older version. Yes, I referred to this, but I might have misunderstood something. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R > > [0]: > http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2016-February/083909.html -- OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21