Hi, zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 11:59, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis: >> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> >> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our >> >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument >> >> since one can easily change the substitute URLs.) >> > >> > I am not following the privacy concern. >> > What do you mean? >> >> I mean that by default, someone who’s disabled substitutes (presumably >> out of security or privacy concerns) would find themself downloading >> source code from ci.guix.gnu.org instead of various upstream sites. [...] > By privacy concern, do you mean that Guix could collect who downloads > what; in a central fashion? Which is not the case when one downloads > from several distributed upstream sources. Right? Exactly. But like I wrote above, I don’t think it’s a strong argument. What remains is the issue with ‘content-addressed-item?’, then. Ludo’.
