zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis: > Just to be sure to understand: > > 1- * 41a2d6a8b9 (newer) > 2- * e70e097882 (between) > 3- * 36640207c9 (older) > 4- * xxxxxxxxxx (first authenticated commit) > > From a fresh cache, > > a) if #2 is authenticated, because it is descendant of #4, it is stored > and all the commits between (closure), i.e., #3 should be considered as > authenticated. > > b) then if #1 is authenticated, because it is a descendant of the last > authenticated i.e. #2, it is stored in the cache. > > c) now let try #3. It is considered authenticated because in the closure > of #4 and #2. > > Yes it makes sense. All is good. :-)
Yup, looks correct. :-) > (And the assumption is: if Guix does not raise then it means that the > commit is authenticated.) Exactly. I know it’s disappointing, but it’s one of these features that’s pretty much invisible until you run into troubles. Ludo’.
