Hello Marius, Marius Bakke <[email protected]> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> writes: > >> Here's the output for the failing tests: > > This is using QEMU transparent emulation, right? Yes. > There is a substitute on Berlin: > > $ guix weather -s armhf-linux gst-plugins-good > computing 1 package derivations for armhf-linux... > looking for 1 store items on https://ci.guix.gnu.org... > updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > https://ci.guix.gnu.org > 100.0% substitutes available (1 out of 1) > at least 4.1 MiB of nars (compressed) > 5.5 MiB on disk (uncompressed) > 1.402 seconds per request (1.4 seconds in total) > 0.7 requests per second > > I'm not sure to what extent we should patch packages to work with QEMU > transparent emulation. And currently the CI does not use it at all for > 32-bit ARM (albeit for rather different reasons). Do we have reasons to believe the QEMU user-mode emulation is not reliable/accurate? That'd be a bummer. I haven't seen any disclaimer in QEMU's documentation ? Thanks, Maxim
