Hello Leo & Guillaume,
> That's a good observation. I hadn't thought of it. > > I'm CC-ing Mathieu Othacehe and guix-sysadmin so that we can disable > these builds until we can fix the bug for real. Mathieu: this might > explain why the build farm is spending all its effort on aarch64. If we want to disable SBCL builds temporarily we can do something similar to what I did to disable Rust builds on non-x86_64 architectures here: 0ed631866cc0b7cece2b0a0b50e39b37ae91bb67. Regarding the rebuilding that is a limitation of the new Cuirass remote building mechanism I am aware of and I need to solve. As build failures are only cached of the machine performing the build and the builds are now distributed to all the machines across the build farm, we need to find a way to centralize the builds failure cache. It would also be nice to optionally publish the build failures cache so that the user doesn't try to build a package that is known to be failing on the build farm. Chris, have you encountered this issue with the Build Coordinator? Thanks, Mathieu
