Hi Mathieu,
>> I also wonder if there might not be a better way to deploy Guix quickly, >> for example by using a relocatable pack of Guix and using “guix copy” >> instead of executing a shell script. > > I think that building a Guix System image and creating a droplet out of > it using the DigitalOcean API, as I described here[1] would be a better > solution. Yes, this seems better than installing Guix on an existing system (which costs time and possibly expensive bandwidth), and to replace the running system with it. FWIW, I wrote Guile AWS[1], which may be useful for doing the same with AWS as a backend. -- Ricardo [1]: https://git.elephly.net/?p=software/guile-aws.git
