Hi, Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Perhaps we could start by testing this hypothesis on a separate build >> farm. Chris, Mathieu, WDYT? > > I'm currently thinking about attempting these kind of things (testing > building derivations under different conditions) through the agent tags > in the Guix Build Coordinator. > > I haven't used this functionality yet, but it's mostly implemented. The > idea is that agents have tags, that describe various attributes that are > important (time=normal, time=future, maybe for example), and builds can > also be targeted at specific agents by tagging the builds with those > same tags. Sounds nice! Also varying kernels I guess. > Where I'm going with this is that I'm not sure a separate build farm is > needed, it would be good to just incorperate this in to the build farm > used for testing patches and non-master branches. Sure. For the build-in-the-future thing, I think we could just do that by default; what I meant is that we just need to double-check beforehand that nothing breaks badly. Thanks, Ludo’.
