Hi Philip, Philip McGrath <phi...@philipmcgrath.com> writes:
> On 4/14/21 1:54 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> In this case, I suspect that within a *.zo file, a Guix store item name >> was split into pieces, with the hash and "-" together in one piece but >> split somewhere between the "-" and the last byte of the store item. >> This results in corruption of the bytes following that piece. FYI, I've now verified this suspicion. Here's precisely the corruption that occurred: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- mhw@jojen ~$ diff -u <(hexdump -C $(guix build racket --no-grafts)/share/racket/pkgs/gui-lib/mred/private/wx/gtk/compiled/utils_rkt.zo) \ <(hexdump -C $(guix build racket )/share/racket/pkgs/gui-lib/mred/private/wx/gtk/compiled/utils_rkt.zo) --- /dev/fd/63 2021-04-15 04:36:01.240427788 -0400 +++ /dev/fd/62 2021-04-15 04:36:01.240427788 -0400 @@ -2047,11 +2047,11 @@ 00007fe0 49 8b 6f 0b 08 00 09 d0 02 2f d7 fe d0 02 07 f2 |I.o....../......| 00007ff0 02 0b 00 62 12 04 00 12 12 05 00 3e 12 06 00 17 |...b.......>....| 00008000 12 07 3d 02 f0 28 32 02 04 75 6e 69 78 00 1e 26 |..=..(2..unix..&| -00008010 5a 2f 67 6e 75 2f 73 74 6f 72 65 2f 69 72 6a 61 |Z/gnu/store/irja| -00008020 6e 35 77 71 37 6a 32 35 66 61 32 6d 36 6e 32 78 |n5wq7j25fa2m6n2x| -00008030 68 6c 38 6d 67 6c 73 61 71 78 6e 34 2d 49 02 02 |hl8mglsaqxn4-I..| -00008040 a5 02 fd 01 2b 73 76 67 2d 32 2e 34 30 2e 30 2f |....+svg-2.40.0/| -00008050 6c 69 62 2f c2 02 39 2e 73 6f 9b 02 1d 43 9b 02 |lib/..9.so...C..| +00008010 5a 2f 67 6e 75 2f 73 74 6f 72 65 2f 36 66 32 30 |Z/gnu/store/6f20| +00008020 38 64 61 6b 32 77 64 62 30 61 72 31 68 6e 38 79 |8dak2wdb0ar1hn8y| +00008030 6b 31 39 30 79 77 67 67 69 77 33 63 2d 67 64 6b |k190ywggiw3c-gdk| +00008040 2d 70 69 78 62 75 66 2b 73 76 67 2d 32 2e 34 30 |-pixbuf+svg-2.40| +00008050 2e 30 62 2f c2 02 39 2e 73 6f 9b 02 1d 43 9b 02 |.0b/..9.so...C..| 00008060 57 30 07 01 02 0e 35 00 05 a2 02 c3 12 08 0c 26 |W0....5........&| 00008070 00 18 12 09 02 2c 84 00 55 02 0f 54 02 09 13 7f |.....,..U..T....| 00008080 54 02 1b 49 54 02 15 32 54 02 15 1c 54 02 1f 01 |T..IT..2T...T...| --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Yes, I agree with this diagnosis. > > It seems the discussion has become a bit fragmented, since Jack first > reported one set of symptoms in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47064> and > you then reported another in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47614> (with > much better forensics than I'd found on my own—thanks!). > > Both issues should have been fixed (at least with respect to Racket) by > my patch in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47180>, which was applied on > Monday. Sounds good, thank you! Mark