Hello Raffael, Raffael Stocker <r.stoc...@mnet-mail.de> writes:
> Interesting indeed. From looking at the source of pcsc-lite (main() in > pcscdaemon.c) it seems it's not modifying its sigmask. IIRC, child > processes inherit the parent's ignored signals, so if shepherd is > ignoring SIGTERM before a fork() and not resetting to default before an > exec(), pcscd will never receive the SIGTERM. This might explain the > behaviour. I have not checked shepherd's source to confirm. > > If this is so, it should probably be fixed in shepherd, right? Thank yu for the analysis of the issue, it helped me a lot to fix it. The sheperd pcscd serice wasn't using the correct procedure to start the daemon, it is fixed in e789ce538ed848bacb8f4eb5742f78b965ccf57c. Cheers, - Brice
