Hello! Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerm...@kolabnow.com> skribis:
> I have bad news and good news. :-) > > Unfortunately, TeX Live 2021 still has this bug. I tested version 20210325 > (which is the latest on the historic TeX Live FTP site), with subversion > tag texlive-2021.3 (which is the latest tag in the TeX Live repo). Bah. Still, if you have the whole texlive upgrade, we should apply it! > The good news is that I found a simple workaround: use pdftex instead of > luatex to build the affected packages. I am currently building all packages > matching ‘^texlive’ a few times to find the ones needing this workaround. > So far, I found these: > > • texlive-amsfonts > • texlive-amscls > • texlive-babel > • texlive-babel-swedish > • texlive-latex-amsmath > • texlive-generic-babel-english > • texlive-latex-cyrillic > • texlive-latex-graphics > • texlive-latex-tools We haven’t heard from dev-luatex yet. I think we should go with this workaround for now (those build failures are frequently preventing evaluations at <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates> from completing, which is a real bummer). Does using ‘pdftex’ rather than ‘luatex’ have an impact on the output of these packages? Thanks! Ludo’.
