Hi Denis, On Thu, 02 Sep 2021 at 16:12, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <gnu...@cyberdimension.org> wrote:
> Between the two tarballs, everything is the same but the provenance > file. > > So here the idea is to make sure that the provenance file is the same > between tarballs made with and without guix time-machine. Yes, for sure. IMHO, the Guix way would be: guix describe -f channels > channels.scm guix pack --save-provenance then later or elsewehere guix time-machine -C channels.scm -- pack --save-provenance It is a workaround of the bug your reported. ;-) Does it work? > Here I get a diff between tarballs made with and without guix > time-machine, with or without your patch, so the patch doesn't fix it > yet for guix master of yesterday. I think your tests about the patch are not correct. As I wrote, this is what you should try, IIUC: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Moreover, if you want to try the patch, you need to run: ./pre-inst-env guix pull -p /tmp/new ./tmp/new/bin/guix describe # return commit 12345 ./tmp/new/bin/guix pack --save-provenance ./tmp/new/bin/guix time-machine --commit=12345 -- pack --save-provenance and be careful with the '--localstatedir' and '--sysconfdir' variables at './configure' time. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- All the best, simon