Hi, On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 04:22, Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@debian.org> wrote:
> So close! Ludo spotted that the for-each needed to be replaced with > append-map, and that basically did it! Indeed, I have not checked the type of full chain. :-) And the return value probably needs to be strongly a list, instead of not-specified. ;-) > Here's to hoping for a guix with fewer glaring typos with which to craft > guix poetry. :) Guix poetry, oh well. :-) > From a171769da0f737468e06866164eadf1e720764ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@debian.org> > Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 04:00:15 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] lint: Add description check for common typos. > > Fixes: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44675 > > * guix/lint.scm (check-description-typo): Add check for occurances of ----^^ Occurrence, no? Well, maybe a US vs UK vs French-glish. :-) > "This packages", "This modules", "allows to" and "permits to" in package > descriptions. > * tests/lint.scm: Add tests for "This packages" and "allows to". > --- > guix/lint.scm | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > tests/lint.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) Otherwise, LGTM. Cheers, simon
