Am Mittwoch, den 24.11.2021, 12:33 -0500 schrieb Leo Famulari: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 06:00:15AM +0100, raingloom wrote: > > I'd love to say it's because I want the package to be more in line > > with libre software guidelines, but honestly I just don't want > > WebKitGTK as a transitive input. A few weeks ago I had to remove > > GVFS from my system because WebKitGTK was failing to build. > > Can you explain the connection between libre software guidelines > (FSDG), GVFS, and WebKitGTK? > > If the problem was simply that the WebKitGTK package was broken for a > few days, I'm sorry, that was my mistake. Note that WebkitGTK is still broken on i686 (bug#51863). I could take some time out of my weekend to fix the issues I raised w.r.t. that patch or we could apply it as-is (though note that hasty as-is applications have not worked out too well for us in the recent past). I'm not sure whether raingloom is on i686 or x86_64, just wanted to point that out.
Cheers
