Hi! Thanks for reporting this.
Vishakh Kumar 写道：
I think this is a case where the hash in the package description might be wrong?
What usually (though, mercifully, rarely) happens is that the hash is correct at the time of packaging, then upstream goes and moves a perfectly good git tag instead of making a new one, and the hash becomes wrong in retrospect.
This case was different: the original packager correctly ran ‘guix hash -rx .’ on their clone of the barrier git repository, but did not first check out the submodules and was unaware that these affect the hash. I don't think the original package ever built, or at least fail to see how it could have.
Fixed on master[0]. Closing, but could you guix pull & confirm that it works for you? Kind regards, T G-R[0]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=7f1cb1ebca169e3a4b5ed59fe226bb614b18b57f
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
