Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prik...@ist.tugraz.at> writes:
block 56971 by 56690 56699 thanks Hi muradm,
Hi Liliana,
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.08.2022 um 12:45 +0300 schrieb muradm:[...] greeter (e.g. gtkgreet) requiring communication with seatd is failing to start, causing "black screen" behavior on active terminal (switching to the other non seatd related terminal is possible, for manual permissions adjustment as workaround). To address this issue, we need more flexible control over seatd user/group, which creates seatd.sock, and greeter user which connects to seatd.sock.Okay.Flexibility for its own sake is not always the right solution. On the other hand, looking at the two patches, it appears they are to be usedHowever, not all greeters require that, so I decided to make more flexible.in combination?
No, technically they are not strongly dependent on each other, could be applied one after another in no particular order. After both are applied, in cooperation they address this issue.
seatd provides a way for display servers to access input/output devicesWhy just the group and no user? Is it not possible to launch seatd asPropsed solutions consists of: * 56690 - gnu: seatd-service-type: Should use seat group. With this change, if seatd-service-type is present in the system configuration, "seat" group will be added, and seatd will run as root/seat. Group is configurable, but default is "seat".non-root?
without having to be root. So seatd it self has to run as root. When seatd opening socket as root/seat, all members of seat would be able to communicate with it. Also socket could be opened withseat/seat for instance, but there is no specific point in doing so.
Will be one more unused system user around. Arch seems to follow similar way, root/seat is ok for socket. Also will signal that seatd is running as root.
* 56699 - gnu: greetd-service-type: Add greeter-extra-groups config field. With this change, if user wants to use seatd-service-type with greeter requiring seatd.sock, he can add "seat" group to greeter-extra-groups field.Note that you still have a TODO on that patch.
That TODO is from the initial commit, it is about cgroup file system mounting, and totally out of scope of this issue.
Cheers
Thanks in advance
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature