Am Sonntag, dem 07.08.2022 um 15:09 +0000 schrieb John Kehayias: > Is the assoc-ref for binutils (implicit input?) equivalent to just > using #$binutils directly? e.g. (string-append "-B" #$binutils > "/bin/") with no added binutils to the inputs. Is that not a good > idea? As a test, that does indeed work, everything configures, > builds, and runs (only tested opening with no configuration). Not quite, because this binutils is actually binutils-final from commencement.scm, which it doesn't seem we can import the normal way. Also doing this would make it so that binutils isn't configurable, which with an input you get. The trick is just to also use make-ld- wrapper from base.scm
Cheers
