Am Mittwoch, dem 28.09.2022 um 19:12 +0200 schrieb Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli: > Hi, > > The faac package is considered nonfree in Debian[1] and also in > Parabola because according to the Parabola blacklist faac "is a > GPL'ed package, but has non free code that can't be distributed under > the GPL"[2]. > > The path chosen by Parabola (and probably most other FSDG compliant > or 100% free distributions) was to make the packages not depend on > faac. Assuming one can clearly point out the non-free sources, the Guix way would be removing those. If they can't easily be separated, then yeah, it has to go.
> A quick search in the Parabola packages list[3] can show some of the > packages having been (re)built without faac support[4]. A list of packages relevant in Guix can be given using `guix refresh -l faac'. Cheers