Hi, On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: > >> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337. > > Yay! Thank you! And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build > farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'? > > That is odd.
Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix challenge blast+:include /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents differ: local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx differing files: /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h 1 store items were analyzed: - 0 (0.0%) were identical - 1 (100.0%) differed - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Cheers, simon