Hello, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> Hi, > > Pierre Langlois <pierre.langl...@gmx.com> skribis: > >> I'm not sure I follow, I'd suggest to revert the revert and then apply a >> fix in the same commit, that way it can easily be reverted again if it's >> problematic, that's probably what you meant already? > > Sounds good to me. The commit log can be similar to the original one > (rather than “Revert: "Revert: "whatever"”), with a couple of lines > like: > > This restores commit XYZ, with an additional fix for … > > Fixes <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59913>. Commit restored as 4913ac74915c4229aeb3ca26a5f9920c759fb6a3, with Pierre's fix (thanks!) Closing. -- Thanks, Maxim
