Changing the po files in guix repo will work at first, it'll be negated next 
time I push changes from weblate. We could change the po files to ensure 
continuity, but we have to also apply the change to the repo behind weblate. I 
can take care of it after the patch is pushed.

Le 22 janvier 2023 15:49:55 GMT+01:00, zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> a 
écrit :
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 17:52, Remco van 't Veer <re...@remworks.net> wrote:
>
>>>> * guix/scripts/gc.scm (guix-gc): Round MiBs in user feedback.
>>>> * po/*/*.po (guix/scripts/gc.scm)a: Round MiBs in user feedback.
>>>
>>> If the way to go with the translation dance?
>>
>> I don't know.  I figured since the translation key was changed this
>> would be the best way to do this but to be honest I don't understand how
>> to do this using "weblate" (from info:guix#Translating Guix).
>
>Julien, WDYT?
>
>
>>> The only change is:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/guix/scripts/gc.scm b/guix/scripts/gc.scm
>>>> index 5e775c5cdb..2bbfb26d5d 100644
>>>> --- a/guix/scripts/gc.scm
>>>> +++ b/guix/scripts/gc.scm
>>>> @@ -260,10 +260,10 @@ (define-command (guix-gc . args)
>>>>      ;; Attempt to have at least SPACE bytes available in STORE.
>>>>      (let ((free (free-disk-space (%store-prefix))))
>>>>        (if (> free space)
>>>> -          (info (G_ "already ~h MiBs available on ~a, nothing to do~%")
>>>> +          (info (G_ "already ~,2h MiBs available on ~a, nothing to do~%")
>>>>                  (/ free 1024. 1024.) (%store-prefix))
>>>>            (let ((to-free (- space free)))
>>>> -            (info (G_ "freeing ~h MiBs~%") (/ to-free 1024. 1024.))
>>>> +            (info (G_ "freeing ~,2h MiBs~%") (/ to-free 1024. 1024.))
>>>>              (collect-garbage store to-free)))))
>>>>
>>>>    (define (delete-generations store pattern)
>>>> @@ -327,10 +327,10 @@ (define-command (guix-gc . args)
>>>>               (ensure-free-space store free-space))
>>>>              (min-freed
>>>>               (let-values (((paths freed) (collect-garbage store 
>>>> min-freed)))
>>>> -              (info (G_ "freed ~h MiBs~%") (/ freed 1024. 1024.))))
>>>> +              (info (G_ "freed ~,2h MiBs~%") (/ freed 1024. 1024.))))
>>>>              (else
>>>>               (let-values (((paths freed) (collect-garbage store)))
>>>> -              (info (G_ "freed ~h MiBs~%") (/ freed 1024. 1024.)))))))
>>>> +              (info (G_ "freed ~,2h MiBs~%") (/ freed 1024. 1024.)))))))
>>>>          ((list-roots)
>>>>           (assert-no-extra-arguments)
>>>>           (list-roots))
>>>
>>> and captured by G_ so does this only to be applied and then all the
>>> msgid updated by the translation process?
>>
>> Yes, this is the only change.  The old keys will be orphaned though and
>> remain in the po files.  I'd be happy to drop the po/*/*.po part of the
>> patch if that helps.
>
>Julien, what is the best solution?  Apply a patch touching all PO files
>or apply a patch touching only the messages captured by G_ and then
>update separately the translations?
>
>
>Cheers,
>simon

Reply via email to