Hi Josselin, Josselin Poiret <d...@jpoiret.xyz> writes:
> Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > >> If you send it *after* the core-updates merge (to core-updates)? It's >> going to be quite a while before it lands to master. Perhaps you could >> send it now? core-updates is the right branch for mass rebuilds. > > I think we are trying to move away from the massive core-updates branch > and rather work with feature branches instead, although the pending > core-updates merge is blocking the change for now. I don't want to add > yet more work for people courageously working on core-updates right now. Perhaps I'm out of the loop, but in my book the main branches should never close. If there's a need to freeze the state of one the three main branches new development branches can be created. This was discussed in the past. -- Thanks, Maxim
