Hi, On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 12:13, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> wrote:
>> Let me know what you think! LGTM! :-) > This looks good to me. In practice, I doubt anyone would use -q with > time-machine, because it makes more sense to specify an explicit channel > file every time. But for pull, I can well imaging using it in a > reproducibility-oriented setting. Well, I am also lacking imagination for “guix time-machine -q”. :-) Moreover, the option precedence (commit, branch, channel file, etc.) is never clear for me. Hum, maybe I could check if it’s documented… ;-) Cheers, simon
