Am Montag, dem 09.10.2023 um 14:21 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > Hello, > > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prik...@gmail.com> writes: > > > [...] > > If you need me to reduce it to four letters, yes, LGTM. > > Explicit is better than implicit. I've been thinking to document > this in our contributing section; e.g. a reviewed commit must have > the 'LGTM' from the reviewer. If a series is LGTM, it needs to be > implicitly mentioned with 'this series LGTM'. That may sound silly, > but I think it'd simplify reviewer/submitters interactions. s/implicitly/explicitly/?
I don't necessarily agree, but it's not a hard disagree either. I'll try to keep that in mind at least when reviewing your patches to not cause confusion. Cheers
