Csepp <raingl...@riseup.net> writes:
> Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could you confirm on i686 native machine that you are able to reproduce
>> the error with:
>>
>> $ guix time-machine --commit= 63660f0 -- shell yt-dlp
>>
>> ?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 02:56, Csepp <raingl...@riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>>> $ guix shell yt-dlp
>>> Backtrace:
>>> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>>> 586:17 19 (map1 (#<<manifest-entry> name: "yt-dlp" version: "202…>))
>>> In guix/profiles.scm:
>>> 1932:19 18 (_ _)
>>> In guix/packages.scm:
>>> 1371:17 17 (supported-package? #<package yt-dlp@2023.06.22 gnu/pa…> …)
>>> In guix/memoization.scm:
>>> 101:0 16 (_ #<hash-table 23e5c90 0/31> #<package yt-dlp@2023.06…> …)
>>> In guix/packages.scm:
>>> 1349:39 15 (_)
>>> 1611:16 14 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
>>> 1715:47 13 (thunk)
>>> In gnu/packages/video.scm:
>>> 2615:11 12 (native-inputs #<package yt-dlp@2023.06.22 gnu/packages…>)
>>> In guix/packages.scm:
>>> 1371:17 11 (supported-package? #<package pandoc@2.14.0.3 gnu/pack…> …)
>>> In guix/memoization.scm:
>>> 101:0 10 (_ #<hash-table 23e5c90 0/31> #<package pandoc@2.14.0.…> …)
>>> In guix/packages.scm:
>>> 1349:39 9 (_)
>>> 1611:16 8 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
>>> 1712:48 7 (thunk)
>>> In gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm:
>>> 9121:35 6 (inputs #<package pandoc@2.14.0.3 gnu/packages/haskell-…>)
>>> In guix/packages.scm:
>>> 1424:32 5 (package-closure _ #:system _)
>>> 1611:16 4 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
>>> 1712:48 3 (thunk)
>>> In gnu/packages/haskell-web.scm:
>>> 943:18 2 (inputs #<package ghc-aeson@2.0.3.0 gnu/packages/haskel…>)
>>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>> 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>>> 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>>>
>>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
>>> error: ghc-onetuple: unbound variable
>>
>>> Running guix search ghc-onetuple indeed does not turn anything up.
>>> guix search ghc-aeson results in the same error halfway through
>>> outputting the description for ghc-aeson.
>>
>> The package ghc-onetuple is defined. As far I can read, it is as the
>> same place since 49a320aaa6fb4c20d6b30c56c35a8c7ffceed822:
>>
>> AuthorDate: Sun Jan 15 10:09:44 2023 +0100
>> CommitDate: Sun Feb 26 10:26:07 2023 +0100
>>
>> And in this report speaks elsewhere about
>> 63660f0febb4aa0d5260791c82dfde15c0df4c79, which comes after:
>>
>> AuthorDate: Tue Jun 27 15:43:27 2023 -0400
>> CommitDate: Tue Jun 27 15:43:27 2023 -0400
>>
>> For instance, see [1]. Therefore, I do not think the issue comes from
>> that. Running,
>>
>> $ guix time-machine --commit= 63660f0 -- shell -s i686-linux yt-dlp
>>
>> I get the error:
>>
>> build of
>> /gnu/store/n2yl83p37j9mazjh58d5fxixjiq188px-ghc-base64-0.4.2.4.drv failed
>>
>> and the message reads:
>>
>> starting phase `check'
>> running "runhaskell Setup.hs" with command "test" and parameters ()
>> Running 1 test suites...
>> Test suite tasty: RUNNING...
>>
>> Test suite tasty: FAIL
>> Test suite logged to: dist/test/base64-0.4.2.4-tasty.log
>> 0 of 1 test suites (0 of 1 test cases) passed.
>> error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
>> %exception #<&invoke-error program: "runhaskell" arguments:
>> ("-package-db=/tmp/guix-build-ghc-base64-0.4.2.4.drv-0/package.conf.d"
>> "Setup.hs" "test") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
>> phase `check' failed after 0.3 seconds
>>
>>
>> 1:
>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm?id=63660f0febb4aa0d5260791c82dfde15c0df4c79#n15164
>>
>> Cheers,
>> simon
>
> Got an error, but not the same one.
>
> ...
> building
> /gnu/store/c7vzg80lankn28pmb53lhfclgw8xdnxk-inferior-script.scm.drv...
> building package cache...
> building profile with 1 package...
> hint: Consider passing the `--check' option once to make sure your shell does
> not clobber environment variables.
>
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 222:29 19 (map1 _)
> 222:29 18 (map1 _)
> 222:29 17 (map1 _)
> 222:29 16 (map1 _)
> 222:29 15 (map1 _)
> 222:29 14 (map1 _)
> 222:29 13 (map1 _)
> 222:29 12 (map1 _)
> 222:17 11 (map1 (((gnu packages tex)) ((gnu packages xml)) ((…)) …))
> 3327:17 10 (resolve-interface (gnu packages tex) #:select _ #:hide …)
> In ice-9/threads.scm:
> 390:8 9 (_ _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 3253:13 8 (_)
> In ice-9/threads.scm:
> 390:8 7 (_ _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 3544:20 6 (_)
> 2836:4 5 (save-module-excursion _)
> 3564:26 4 (_)
> In unknown file:
> 3 (primitive-load-path "gnu/packages/tex" #<procedure 889…>)
> In gnu/packages/tex.scm:
> GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 8388608 bytes
> ...repeats a bunch of times...
> GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 8388608 bytes
> GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 65536 bytes
> GC Warning: Out of Memory! Heap size: 2498 MiB. Returning NULL!
> Exception thrown while printing backtrace:
> Out of memory
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> error: license:arphic-1999: unbound variable
And another error with a pull from about an hour ago, this is from
trying to reconfigure.
Pull was offloaded from the i686 netbook to the x86_64 PC.
guix describe:
Generation 21 Dec 30 2023 02:54:01 (current)
guix f76ca2b
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: f76ca2b0e894c244d5011a32b30dee8fd874e322
raingloom b528a4a
repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~raingloom/guix-packages
branch: master
commit: b528a4a906011efb52bc4db916408c5f12f387ec
nonguix 8956906
repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix.git
branch: master
commit: 8956906f6bed6709e71f0c26ed6a3620f40dc487
./pre-inst-env guile --no-auto-compile raingloom/machines.scm
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 6 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In unknown file:
5 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk ed330>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
724:2 4 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle…>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 3 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) df690>)))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2836:4 2 (save-module-excursion _)
4388:12 1 (_)
In gnu/services.scm:
419:6 0 (_)
gnu/services.scm:419:6: error: %modify-services: unbound variable
pre-inst-env just prepends my config repo to the GUILE_LOAD_PATH, this
specific file has some shared definitions for my actual machine configs.
It doesn't do anything weird, no module reflection, etc, just a plain
declarative module.
