reopen 68229 quit Hi,
Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes: > On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer > <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>Hello, >> >>Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >>>> >>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification >>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information >>>> > about this build <a >>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details";>here</a>.</p> >>>> > >>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details >>>> >>>> The test failure is: >>>> >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) >>>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) >>>> script_test.go:193: >>>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) >>>> > go build -o complex.exe complex >>>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex >>>> [stderr] >>>> # complex >>>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option >>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' >>>> [exit status 2] >>>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command >>>> failure >>>> >>>> FAIL >>>> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>>> >>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching >>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. >>> >>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. >> >>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though, >>since it's an actual problem? >> > Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing > depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not > supported otherwise. Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up. The task would be to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently inherits from it. Any takers? -- Thanks, Maxim
