Hi, Thanks all for the quick fix.
Well, I am asking here but maybe such discussion would deserve its own thread on guix-devel. :-) On mer., 10 janv. 2024 at 15:35, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Thanks for the quick investigation and patch! I just realized that this > affects current ‘master’ so we’d rather fix it soon. > > What do you think of the attached patch? The difference is that it > patches code at its root (in the actual source tarball rather than after > it’s been copied), it does so for IcedTea 7 and 8, and there are patch > files that are slightly clearer than a substitution pattern. This fixes the future but not the past. Hum, headache with guix time-machine? :-) The question is twofold: 1. Do we document that some Java stack is broken for “guix time-machine”? Other said, have we an evaluation about which Guix revisions are broken for the stack of Java? 2. Do we provide a “transformation” for fixing such break? Something that rewrite on the fly the origin for patching it; accessible only via manifest. WDYT? Cheers, simon