I think channel level configuration of some form for code archival is a good idea so individual channels can choose to disable it. I also agree that we should make the fact that guix lint does archival more prominent.
I disagree with a statement that permission is required, but I'll avoid rehashing the discussion ongoing in guix-devel. [1] I think there is a good reason to support disabling archival at the channel level. Simon, do you think your patch can/will manage that? > Somehow I disagree with this. And I propose the generic approach that > allows to exclude any checkers from the package definition using the > field properties. > > See <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71697#1>. [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-06/msg00192.html -- Take it easy, Richard Sent Making my computer weirder one commit at a time.
