Hi, Vincent Legoll <vincent.leg...@gmail.com> skribis:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:54 PM Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> There’s no x86_64 QCOW2 image, that’s why. :-) >> > > OK, that's a why, but may I ask why ? I don’t think there’s any particular reason, though one valid consideration is disk usage. [...] > And to be completely clear, I'm not reporting this issue for myself, because > I built that x86_64 qcow2 image locally and it's woking fine. I just think > the > path of least surprise for people who click on the latest dowload page is to > find the same as on the release one. Yeah, we should probably consider doing that for symmetry. > Maybe you have decided that it's not worth the computing power usage, > and that would be fine with me. Just close the issue as "wontfix". I’m closing this one but we can track the QCOW2 image issue separately. Thanks, Ludo’.
