Hello Maxim, > I'm guessing it's simply getting a bit dated? In my experience, as soon > as you fall one on a few stable releases behind, you start experimenting > more problems. I'm not sure if Jami is supposed to be backward > compatible with previous versions, but even if it was, it's probably not > super well tested.
Right, make sense. I check the logs and realized it’s actually packaging an old commit. > I'd suggest updating it (but as you noted, that's sadly often not > trivial). I could provide some assistance if you'd like to pick up its > maintenance. Well, to be honest, I don’t exactly piece together how Jami gets packaged on Guix? Also, why do we need to package ffmpeg-jami separately? Can you give a brief idea of how it is packaged currently, and what are the caveats? I have a hunch that it should/can be done better, but not sure how exactly. Regards, -- Divya Ranjan, Philosophy, Mathematics, Libre Software. PGP Fingerprint: F0B3 1A69 8006 8FB8 096A 2F12 B245 10C6 108C 8D4A
