Hi Vagrant, > gnu/packages/python-graphics.scm > > Again, no license declaration, but a list of copyright holders including > Adam Kandur <[email protected]>, Daniel Meißner > <[email protected]>, Morgan Smith > <[email protected]>, Adam Faiz <[email protected]>, Simon > Tournier <[email protected]>, and Sharlatan Hellseher > <[email protected]>.
May you clarify what exactly do you mean under "no license declaration"?
I see this in the used modules:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define-module (gnu packages python-graphics)
#:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
and
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> grep license gnu/packages/python-graphics.scm
#:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
(license license:expat))))
(license license:expat)))
(license license:bsd-3)))
(license license:bsd-3)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Licenses are defined in "guix/licenses.scm"
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define bsd-3
(license "Modified BSD"
"http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:BSD_3Clause";
"https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#ModifiedBSD";))
;; Some people call it the MIT license. For clarification see:
;; https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Expat
(define expat
(license "Expat"
"http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Expat";
"https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Expat";))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
And each package has a valid license in the definition, or maybe it's
something else?
I've initiated python-graphics (similar to crates.graphics and
java-graphics) module to collect and move anything which requires messa
or similar low level bindings for Python. There a lot in python-xyz
which would be moved in this module.
--
Oleg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
