Hi Ludo, On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 at 22:57, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon Tournier <[email protected]> skribis: > >> Last cherry on the top, from [1], the implementation relying on “git >> merge-base --is-ancestor” is 35x faster. > > Uh, interesting! I would still like to avoid shelling out to Git for > common operations, but this comparison shows there’s a lot of room to > improve the performance of the current implementation.
You mean the current implementation of ligbit2, right? Because, from my poor understanding, it’s part of the performance barrier. Cheers, simon
