Hi,
For more context, see:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/74895
Thanks for the report.
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 at 09:57, Drew Jose <[email protected]> wrote:
> Output pasted here:
>
> Backtrace:
> 17 (primitive-load
> "/gnu/store/flaqwpkc12w1kwjqs5a6njr8nbxmbns3-compute-guix-derivation")
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 155:9 16 (_ _)
> 159:9 15 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?)
> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 152:2 14 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
> 152:2 13 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 2210:24 12 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>
> #<procedure 7ff78038ee10 at guix/self.scm:1365?> ?)
> 2038:8 11 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>)
> In guix/gexp.scm:
> 300:22 10 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>)
> 1218:2 9 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>)
> 1085:2 8 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>)
> 926:4 7 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 2095:12 6 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>)
> 1433:5 5 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>
> #<procedure 7ff78b634cc0 at guix/store.?> ?)
> 1449:15 4 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0>
> ("/gnu/store/aynip4d3gparb4mkq9zzviafmnx0dsmp-guix-daemo?" ?) ?)
> 1449:15 3 (loop #f)
> 746:11 2 (process-stderr #<store-connection 256.99 7ff79f3870a0> _)
> In guix/serialization.scm:
> 101:11 1 (read-int #<input-output: file 10>)
> 79:6 0 (get-bytevector-n* #<input-output: file 10> 8)
>
> guix/serialization.scm:79:6: In procedure get-bytevector-n*:
> ERROR:
> 1. &nar-error:
> file: #f
> port: #<input-output: file 10>
> guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
> '/gnu/store/flaqwpkc12w1kwjqs5a6njr8nbxmbns3-compute-guix-derivation'
> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
> "cfd4f56f75a20b6732d463180d211f796c9032e5"; system: "x86_64-linux";
> host version: "3e2442de5268782213b04048463fcbc5d76accd7"; pull-version: 1).
I think it’s transient and comes from a network issue. It’s already
known and sadly poorly covered. However, this ticker isn’t actionable.
Closing.
Cheers,
simon
