Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It is either indistinguishable, in which case it doesn't need to > > exist, or it has *some* difference in semantics--any difference > > whatsoever--in which case it should not share the same identity port. > > You seem to be talking about some general principle of filesystem > properness. In the case of a translator like fakeroot, its purpose is > convenient deception and whatever deceits are most convenient are the right > choices.
Right, but I think the same thing is true in the case of fakeroot. At least, I think so unless there is some clear reason why it should face io_identity. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
